Brought to you by NZCity

 | main | news | security | policing 18 Aug 2017 | crime.co.nz 
SEARCH: 
 Main NZ law and order news
Send a link to this article to a friend via email
 crime.files
  
 Murder
 Unsolved
 Sexual Crime
 White Collar
 Child Abuse
 Political & Misc.

 crime.features
  
 Crime news
 Home security
 Business security
 Security services
 Policing NZ
 NZ Parole Board
 Psychology&Law
 Kidz Korner
 Firearms in NZ

 crime.resources
  
 Prevention
 For Victims
 Drug Abuse
 Alcohol Abuse
 Legal Resources
 Crime Statistics
 Family Violence
 Support Services
 NewsLinks

 crime.co.nz
  
 HOME
 About Us
 Contribute
 Contact Us
 Feedback
 NZCity


Click here to add crime.co.nz to your NZCity Personal Start Page

The evidence of Dean Cottle
Dean Cottle was murder victim Laniet Bain's friend and appeared to have been supportive during her turbulent years leading up to her death. It was alleged he had helped her and lent her his cell-phone to keep in contact with her clients, whilst she worked as a prostitute.
Although he had information he believed might be important in the trial and of value to David Bain’s defence, he disappeared. This information concerned alleged comments by Laniet that she had been sexually abused by her father Robin and was going to confront him in front of the rest of the family, just before the murders. Were such allegations true, they may have provided a motive for Robin Bain to have committed the murders.

Cottle was served with a subpoena to attend court on 29 April 1995 but he failed to appear and an arrest warrant was issued. The subpoena had been served by Defence private investigator Wayne Idour. Cottle appeared before the court voluntarily on 26 May 1995 claiming he had not seen Idour prior to his attendance. He went on say he had contacted police, but was told he was not required at court.

The Bain trial was about to reconvene to hear the Defence’s final address when Justice Williamson was told Cottle had presented himself at court to answer the arrest warrant. Justice Williamson ruled, even at that late stage, that the Defence could call Cottle.

Both counsel questioned him about his failure to appear and about the statement he made to police in June 1994. Cottle was unable to recall details of the conversation with Laniet and his general state was such, that after hearing him, Justice Williamson concluded his evidence was hearsay. He said hearsay is normally excluded because of the well known dangers against which the hearsay rule guards. “Those dangers can be put to one side if the court is satisfied that the evidence, although not in accordance with the rule, is perfectly safe and reliable, or at least reasonably so. I am not so satisfied in this case and accordingly I rule against its admission."

After Bain was sentenced to life imprisonment, Cottle elaborated on his evidence in an affidavit to Defence Counsel Michael Guest, which was used for Bain's appeal. However, the appeal was dismissed as was the appeal to the Privy Council in London.

Next related article: Forward to The police investigation into the handling of the caseThe police investigation into the handling of the case
Prev related article: Back to The strange behaviour of Nicholas GreetThe strange behaviour of Nicholas Greet

Back to The David Bain Case Index
 

Should Dean Cottle’s Evidence have been admitted?

© 2017 NZCity
For marketing opportunities contact: www.webads.co.nz